Even those of us who think we understand the many facets of global warming still get blown away from time to time as we learn more and more about the plans of the elite and how powerful, pervasive, and ubiquitous this global warming agenda is. "The rabid 'environmentalists' behind the green agenda intend to take all human activity and put it into a box called 'sustainable development.'" See the last section for this email for definition and explanation of sustainable development.
Al Gore, who is almost synonymous with global warming, touched on one of the key elements of sustainable development and Agenda 21 recently with this comment: "One of the things we could do…to put out less of this pollution…You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children they have." (Of course, abortion is part of fertility management)
Gore's statements are purposely deceitful and mild so as to be acceptable, but note the more blatant quotes below. The first three are by the United Nations in a document in 2009 entitled, "Facing A Changing World: Women, Population and Climate."
1) "Each birth results not only in the emissions attributable to that person in his or her lifetime, but also the emissions of all his or her descendants. Hence, the emissions savings from intended or planned births multiply with time."
2) "No human is genuinely "carbon neutral," especially when all greenhouse gases are figured into the equation. Therefore, everyone is part of the problem, so everyone must be part of the solution in some way." The world's Governments and peoples will need to work together on every aspect of the factors that increase greenhouse-gas emissions. One such factor is the earth's growing population."
3) "Strong family planning programs are in the interests of all countries for greenhouse-gas concerns as well as for broader welfare concerns." [birth & population control]
In an article entitled, "What nobody wants to hear, but everyone needs to know," Pianka, Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin, a prominent advocate of radical human population control made the following shocking statements:
*First, and foremost, we must get out of denial and recognize that Earth simply cannot support many billions of people.
*This planet might be able to support perhaps as many as half a billion people [current world population is 6.8 billion] who could live a sustainable life in relative comfort. Human populations must be greatly diminished, and as quickly as possible to limit further environmental damage.
*I do not bear any ill will toward humanity. However, I am convinced that the world WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.
* Many people believe that Earth and all its resources exist solely for human benefit and consumption, this is anthropocentrism. We should allow the millions of other denizens of this Earth some space to live -- they evolved here just as we did and have a right to this planet, too. http://peakoil.com/enviroment/al-gore-agenda-21-and-population-control/ & http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~varanus/Everybody.html
The following is language from a UN resolution that was adopted by the UN General Assembly that was designed to further the implementation of Agenda 21….
"The current decline in population growth rates must be further promoted through national and international policies that promote economic development, social development, environmental protection, and poverty eradication, particularly the further expansion of basic education, with full and equal access for girls and women, and health care, including reproductive health care, including both family planning and sexual health, consistent with the report of the International Conference on Population and Development.” http://peakoil.com/enviroment/al-gore-agenda-21-and-population-control/
A Finnish environmentalist named Pentti Linkola has gone even farther than that. Linkola is openly calling for climate change deniers to be re-educated, for an eco-fascist world government to be established, for humans to be forcibly sterilized and for the majority of humans to be killed.
This radical agenda is even represented in the White House.
"John P. Holdren, Barack Obama's top science advisor, co-authored a textbook entitled "Ecoscience" back in 1977 in which he actually advocated mass sterilization, compulsory abortion, a one world government and a global police force to enforce population control.
"On page 837 of Ecoscience, a claim is made that compulsory abortion would be perfectly legal under the U.S. Constitution....
“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
"On pages 942 and 943, a call is made for the creation of a "planetary regime" that would control the global economy and enforce population control measures....
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.” http://peakoil.com/enviroment/al-gore-agenda-21-and-population-control/
The above are just a few examples that could be given. For more quotes see this article, "Al Gore, Agenda 21 and Population Control" at this link: http://peakoil.com/enviroment/al-gore-agenda-21-and-population-control/
And does anyone doubt that Al Gore and Obama are on the same page and that Gore's quotes were designed to pave the way for Obama's mandate for FREE coverage of birth control as prevention, with NO COPAYS? Free birth control with No Copays would ensure Al Gores's statement: "You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management."
Tea Parties Can't Win Without This Information
An environmentalist, John Muir, captured the essence of global warming advocates when he said, "Tug on anything at all and you'll find it connected to everything else in the universe." Tug at any issue in our world; dig deep, and global warming will be somewhere in the mixture in the root of the concern – abortion, family planning, health, the economy, alternative fuels, waterways, housing, energy, fuel, transportation, sustainability, Agenda 21, city planning, bikeways, walkways, redistribution of wealth, cap and trade, and on and on. To understand the global warming goals, one has to understand Sustainable Development and Agenda 21.
http://www.calepa.ca.gov/Education/EEI/Curriculum/default.htm Link to Muir'squote)
Following are definitions of sustainable development: (The first one is mine)
· Sustainable development is a plan to save our planet from global warming that reaches into every area of our lives – even birth control and doing away with cars.
· Sustainable development is a pattern of resource use that aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment.
· Sustainable development is a United Nations plan and is almost synonymous with the UN Agenda 21 which is a comprehensive blueprint of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by the UN, governments and organizations in every area in which humans directly affect the environment – developed in 1992. 178 nations have signed on to Agenda 21.
Of course, the term "global warming" is now archaic. The politically correct form is "climate change." Global warming was not expansive enough nor deceptive enough to cover all the aspects its proponents wished to cover in the term; not to mention the fact that even simpletons can see through their fallacy when their prophecies of global warming don't come true. "The UN reports that they have about 2,500 "scientists" who state there is "global warming". There are more than 31,000 scientists who state otherwise. DO THE MATH. That's about 8% vs. 92%! For a link to the 31,000 scientists who signed the petition opposing the concept of global warming, see this link: http://www.petitionproject.org/signers_by_state_main.php. Also see these two links: http://www.globalwarmingisafarce.com/ and http://www.petitionproject.org
Three more articles that explain the breadth and danger of Sustainable Development:
http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom145.htm - Tea Parties Cannot Win Back The Republic Without This Information
http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom137.htm Part 1 - America is drowning in a sea of rules and regulations, particularly under the guise of "saving the environment."
http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom138.htm Part 2 - Perhaps the most egregious action item offered in the Urban Environmental Accords dealt with the topic of water. Action item number 19 called for adoption and implementation of a policy to reduce individual water consumption.
This article became too long to include the other articles in the title of this email that are connected to this one ( because they are all part of Sustainable Development, and Agenda 21, and Global Warming), so watch for them in forthcoming emails or go to the links below to read them now.
European Union To Ban Cars From Cities By 2050 http://www.wpaag.org/Sus%20Dev%20-%20Europen%20Union%20to%20ban%20cars%20by%202050.htm
Maryland Now Requiring Environmental Literacy to Graduate – K-2
Posted September 1, 2011